<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Tubejumper - Latest Comments</title><link>http://tubejumper.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://tubejumper.disqus.com/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 23 Sep 2012 15:44:07 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Newest Reader</title><link>http://www.tubejumper.com/index.php/2010/09/09/newest-reader/#comment-660174509</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Ultimate coolness.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">N/A</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 23 Sep 2012 15:44:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Search Keyword OPML Generator</title><link>http://www.tubejumper.com/index.php/2009/01/20/search-keyword-opml-generator/#comment-660172043</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Way cool.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">N/A</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 23 Sep 2012 15:41:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: RSS Fatigue</title><link>http://www.tubejumper.com/index.php/2007/10/13/rss-fatigue/#comment-660171345</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Cool.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">N/A</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 23 Sep 2012 15:40:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Bundling</title><link>http://www.tubejumper.com/index.php/2008/03/24/bundling/#comment-660171006</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Very cool.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">N/A</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 23 Sep 2012 15:40:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Test Post</title><link>http://www.tubejumper.com/index.php/2011/06/01/test-post/#comment-215548953</link><description>&lt;p&gt;test comment&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">smilbandit</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2011 12:53:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter API 2 RSS</title><link>http://www.tubejumper.com/index.php/2011/05/27/twitter-api-2-rss/#comment-213401209</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm not a rewrite expert but I was getting the same 500 error until I found out about RewriteBase and added that to the mix.  Here's an example of the code working, &lt;a href="http://tubejumper.com/twitter/Scobleizer/super-mobile-users" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://tubejumper.com/twitter/Scobleizer/super-mobile-users"&gt;http://tubejumper.com/twitt...&lt;/a&gt;  I'm using godaddy perhaps mine's working due to there environment setup.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">smilbandit</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 28 May 2011 09:57:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter API 2 RSS</title><link>http://www.tubejumper.com/index.php/2011/05/27/twitter-api-2-rss/#comment-213189422</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Not sure I'm seeing the difference from using &lt;a href="http://search.twitter.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="search.twitter.com"&gt;search.twitter.com&lt;/a&gt; and searching by username and then subscribing to that searches rss...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Guest</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 27 May 2011 22:29:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter API 2 RSS</title><link>http://www.tubejumper.com/index.php/2011/05/27/twitter-api-2-rss/#comment-212869426</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I have tried it. But always encountered 500 Internal server error. Why? I think there is someting wrong about htaccess! What do you think?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">E-Siber</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 27 May 2011 13:15:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: RSS 2 DB engine</title><link>http://www.tubejumper.com/index.php/2009/02/19/rss-2-db-engine/#comment-26668152</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Cool man.. thanks for sharing the code.. It worked out so quick for me. After struggling on the net to find the right solution. You code was an instant hit.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Keep up this great work!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">PeterParker</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2009 10:28:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Pubsubhubbub</title><link>http://www.tubejumper.com/index.php/2009/09/03/pubsubhubbub/#comment-15983504</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I could shout the same thing back to you.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">shawn</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 13:05:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Pubsubhubbub</title><link>http://www.tubejumper.com/index.php/2009/09/03/pubsubhubbub/#comment-15983502</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Very Cool! Nice work.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Brett Slatkin</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 12:44:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Decrypting MS SQL 2000 Stored Procedures</title><link>http://www.tubejumper.com/index.php/2008/06/19/decrypting-ms-sql-2000-stored-procedures/#comment-15983478</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Does anyone know if there is another language or set of commands beside SQL for talking with databases?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I'm working on a project and am doing some research thanks&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">SQL Tutorials</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 22:54:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Fading</title><link>http://www.tubejumper.com/index.php/2008/04/10/fading/#comment-15983463</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm using one I built.  Just an experiment to see what can be done that hasn't.  I posted some images on flickr of it recently, &lt;a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/26597120@N00/sets/72157608057316070/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.flickr.com/photos/26597120@N00/sets/72157608057316070/"&gt;http://www.flickr.com/photo...&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">shawn</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 22:54:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Fading</title><link>http://www.tubejumper.com/index.php/2008/04/10/fading/#comment-15983462</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Which reader are you using?  There is still so much improvement to be had in the feed reading space.  I've been experimenting with Google Reader and with Filtrbox.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Allan</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 20:59:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Decrypting MS SQL 2000 Stored Procedures</title><link>http://www.tubejumper.com/index.php/2008/06/19/decrypting-ms-sql-2000-stored-procedures/#comment-15983477</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Give it a shot on a test SP.  Shoot me an email if you have questions.  Cheers.&lt;br&gt;-a-&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anthony</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 20:32:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Decrypting MS SQL 2000 Stored Procedures</title><link>http://www.tubejumper.com/index.php/2008/06/19/decrypting-ms-sql-2000-stored-procedures/#comment-15983476</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Got the script.  I'm wishing I had some encrypted sp's on sql 2005 to use it on.  It's in my utility belt now so i'll have it if i need it in the future.  Thanks.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">shawn</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 19:37:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Decrypting MS SQL 2000 Stored Procedures</title><link>http://www.tubejumper.com/index.php/2008/06/19/decrypting-ms-sql-2000-stored-procedures/#comment-15983475</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Sent the script, to your email, that creates a SP that decrypts a SP that has been encrypted CREATED or ALTERED "with encryption" in SQL Server 2005.  I found it on Google Groups and it seems to only do SP's.  I am going to try to alter it to do Views also. Let me know if you didnt get it.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anthony</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 19:29:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Decrypting MS SQL 2000 Stored Procedures</title><link>http://www.tubejumper.com/index.php/2008/06/19/decrypting-ms-sql-2000-stored-procedures/#comment-15983474</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I didn't try the script with sql 2005 so it's probably the factor.  What did you do to get it working?  If you wouldn't mind, email it to shawn@tubejumper.com, I'd love to take a look.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">shawn</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 16:41:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Decrypting MS SQL 2000 Stored Procedures</title><link>http://www.tubejumper.com/index.php/2008/06/19/decrypting-ms-sql-2000-stored-procedures/#comment-15983473</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Ok, I got it to work.  Decrypting that is.  I think (but not sure) that the problem I had was I was using a SQL 2005 database.   Further Google searches revealed this thread:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://groups.google.com/group/microsoft.public.sqlserver.security/browse_thread/thread/f3d7cb526eabac4d/67d992638df8ec66?hl=en&amp;amp;lnk=st&amp;amp;q=DECRYPT+stored+procedure+2005#67d992638df8ec66" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://groups.google.com/group/microsoft.public.sqlserver.security/browse_thread/thread/f3d7cb526eabac4d/67d992638df8ec66?hl=en&amp;amp;lnk=st&amp;amp;q=DECRYPT+stored+procedure+2005#67d992638df8ec66"&gt;http://groups.google.com/gr...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;For now, this works good for me.  My sprocs arent greater then 4K.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thanks for putting up with me!  :-)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anthony</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 16:18:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Decrypting MS SQL 2000 Stored Procedures</title><link>http://www.tubejumper.com/index.php/2008/06/19/decrypting-ms-sql-2000-stored-procedures/#comment-15983472</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hello Shawn,  I see....   I am logging in with "sa" and have full rights.  Its a development DB and I am the only developer on this (now) as the other developer has left, and left me with encrypted sprocs.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I will restore and then try to run this script once, halting it where it has decrypted the sproc and hopefully I can see what its about to replace (on that delete and create step).&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anthony</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 15:05:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Decrypting MS SQL 2000 Stored Procedures</title><link>http://www.tubejumper.com/index.php/2008/06/19/decrypting-ms-sql-2000-stored-procedures/#comment-15983471</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It might be do to the rights given to the id your connecting to sql with.  If it doesn't have the right to create sp's then these tools will not work.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;There is no function in sql that will unencrypt the sp's.  What the tools do is decrypt them in memory and then recreate them again by deleting and running the create sp comand with the contents unencrypted.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Hope that makes sense and not circular.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">shawn</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 11:34:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Decrypting MS SQL 2000 Stored Procedures</title><link>http://www.tubejumper.com/index.php/2008/06/19/decrypting-ms-sql-2000-stored-procedures/#comment-15983470</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Didnt work.  :-(   The script simply deleted all of the stored procedures, those the messages seemed to indicate that it ran OK.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;spACCOUNT_Delete - Decrypted&lt;br&gt;spACCOUNT_Update - Decrypted&lt;br&gt;spACCOUNT_Insert - Decrypted&lt;br&gt;spACCOUNT_Copy - Decrypted&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;and so on..   150+ SP's deleted.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I will have to restore.  Why would it delete them.  There were no signs of them anywhere, just the sp_decrypt_sp that was being called to decrypt...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Oh well.  Almost every solution I've tried simply deletes the SP and doesnt decrypt them.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anthony</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 11:28:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Decrypting MS SQL 2000 Stored Procedures</title><link>http://www.tubejumper.com/index.php/2008/06/19/decrypting-ms-sql-2000-stored-procedures/#comment-15983469</link><description>&lt;p&gt;OK, cool.  I will give this a try.  Thanks so much!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anthony</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 10:55:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Decrypting MS SQL 2000 Stored Procedures</title><link>http://www.tubejumper.com/index.php/2008/06/19/decrypting-ms-sql-2000-stored-procedures/#comment-15983468</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I ran the script at the command line using cscript.exe, which should be on all win xp sp2 installs.  It's setup using a trusted connection, but you can modify the connstring variable if you need to use a sql login.  Just replace Trusted_Connection=yes with uid=id;pwd=password for sql login.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">shawn</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 10:27:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Decrypting MS SQL 2000 Stored Procedures</title><link>http://www.tubejumper.com/index.php/2008/06/19/decrypting-ms-sql-2000-stored-procedures/#comment-15983467</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Forgot to ask, did you run that from the command line as a WSH script?  I am not familiar with that but shall attempt.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anthony</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 09:23:07 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>